Physics Challenge!
Lately my interest in physics has sparked (no pun intended), and as if on cue the school announced that they would be entering the top physicists, the creme-de-la-creme of Year 11 in the highly esteemed, much sought-after, CV-boosting, nationwide physics competition that is The Physics Challenge.
The Physics Challenge consists of just a 1 hour test paper; nothing more, nothing less. Anyone who scores above 20/50 gets a commendation, but those that score above 35/50 get their papers sent to a mysterious place in Oxford where they are evaluated and given either bronze, silver or gold award. Last year only one person (out of many) managed a bronze, which proves why it's called "challenge".
No doubt those that get Gold are the uber-geek Jedi Masters with IQs past 200 who will later be head-hunted for the International Physics Olympiad. This is no piss-easy, I-Could-Sleep-Through-This-And-Still-Get-An-A* GCSE, Hell no. This is the real deal.
If you still can't grasp the difficulty of the paper, then think University Challenge but with Physics for every round.
Now the school only offered this fantastic opportunity to those who had scored 70% (an A) in the mock, but this basically meant that everyone (even the complete morons) who take physics could enter if they wish.
Of course some won't even consider entering (we are talking about students from Liverpool after all), but I think my year group stands a chance of doing extremely well (relatively that is, compared to the other Y11s of years past). This is because this is the first Year 11 group that is not single sex and it's common knowledge that female students are vastly superior academically compared to their male counter-parts (there's no denying it, boys are lazy).
But anyway, I tried doing a past paper last night and it was, to put it mildly, impossible. I'm one of more intelligent (and modest) people in my school and I had no clue, no fucking clue. I do Further Maths which is pretty damn hard but at least I understand what needs to be done, for this I had no idea.
This is something I want to do extremely well in considering how CV-driven I am. Makes me glad my dad teaches mechanical engineering.
There's also added incentive to do well on this test: my arrogant friends. Nick and Rob did extremely well in their Chemistry mocks and think they can lord it over the rest of us and developing ideas above their station. There's been a lot of banter as to who will do well in the sciences for GCSE and they've already written off my chances (my chances? wtf?). This will provide the perfect opportunity for me to burst their over-inflated egos on a higher plateau of thinking.
But, I'm now beginning to feel the pressure (again, no pun intended). I'm becoming overwhelmed by my increasing workload and it's become quite an act juggling the revision time for 9 GCSEs, 1 Further Maths and now this. By the end of it all I'll be so stressed out those that are stressed out will seem laid back compared to me. But still, if I succeed it'll blow litter-picking out of the water in terms of CV-ability.
I better get gold.



19 comments:
"There's also added incentive to do well on this test: my arrogant friends."
And I thought it only happened in Singapore. Haha. Silly me. Well you sound incredibly confident and ambitious, and to me, that sounds like half the battle is already won! :D
When I didn't know the answer I always picked "B" It's amazing how many scolorship opprotunities that opened for me ;)
Good luck on the test.
I got Hawking and Dawkins, but I have no idea who the guy on the left is.
Faith: it's like that everywhere! Still, I thrive on competition.
Ambitious yes, confident no. The test is ridiculously hard and if I revise real hard and devote all my energy to it then I might, just might, get a bronze.
hammer: it's a shame only 10 marks are multiple choice! The rest are tough numerical equations and every one of them is a trick question.
Should be fun :D
anonymouscoworker: you're right about Dawkins and Hawking. The guy on the left is my favourite physicist (I met him in London at Imperial College) and he is the co-founder of string theory.
And he's also a pretty cool guy. Not like Hawking.
The japanese dude and hawkings i can understand (forgot the jap dude's name. I am never good with japanese names)
But Dawkins? wtf?
Sorry, double post, but,
Penrose would be a better person for your third picture rolf
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/penrose.html
I can use my influence with the markers if you slip me a few quid me old mate - it didn't Dave and Rob did it? heheheh...
shoufarn: I know, Dawkins? What was I thinking? I have still to read "The God Delusion".
Gotta love Michio Kaku! Total legend!
Mutley: I would gladly do so if you give an address ;)
It's common knowledge that female students are vastly superior academically compared to their male counter-parts.
Males are usually much better in Physics (in fact all kinds of science), trust me.
Girls have good work ethic, even if they are not naturally good at it.
Good luck with that!!
I have absolutely NO IDEA who any of those strange-looking men are!!?? But if you pass the test, even with a BRONZE - do you end up looking like THAT???? hahahaha
kb: Those strange looking men are physicists! And yes, I probably will eventually end up looking like that (in like 50 years though)
The Physics Challenge sounds like a real physical challenge to you.
argh my science teacher entered me into the physics challenge, and I have no idea what's in it. I have never seen a past paper :S
blankcanvasses.blogspot.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoy reading blankcanvasses.blogspot.com every day.
faxless payday loan
online payday loans canada
Post a Comment